Landscapes - People - Global change

Category: research impact (Page 2 of 12)

Winter 2025 panels, presentations and events

Panelists and UNBSJ student organizers for the Climate Change Science and Action Panel on Mar 20 in Saint John.

On March 16th, this blog turned ten years old, and that feels like something to celebrate. But I’ve been a bit remiss on content so far this year. Last week’s visit to UNBSJ at the invitation of the Biological Sciences PhD student organization is a great prompt to remedy that. I joined a panel on Climate Change Science and Action with Moe Qureshi of the Conservation Council of NB and Helen Gurney-Smith of DFO in St. Andrews to talk across scales from global to local. The 2 hour discussion was followed up by a great networking event at the Haven Music Hall where I got to meet more of the students, some local partners and professors. Thanks to the organizers for the great event.

Earlier this term I also enjoyed meeting with the Local Government Group of the Green Shores program, a Maritimes outpost of the program originally developed by the Stewardship Council of BC run out of TransCoastal Adaptations at SMU. During that online presentation I learned that in December Green Shores developed an 8-page publication for the general public based on the final report from the NRCan project Making Room for Movement and the paper I led last year on Reimagining nature-based coastal adaptation using the 5Rs (reimagine, reserve, relocate, restore, reinforce), published in the Journal of Flood Risk Management. The policy brief, Green Shores and the 5Rs for Nature-based Coastal Adaptation , shows how Green Shores is operationalizing the framework we outlined. More recently I reprised my presentation to Green Shores  to the TransCoastal Adaptations Lesson of the Week group.

Presenting to the Green Shores Local Government Group on Jan 15, 2024.

Other key events in recent months have been profile-raising events for SRES within Dalhousie, including the Graduate Fair (in person and online) in early February, the Sustainable Development Goals Expo in early March, and today’s engagement event with Black and African Nova Scotian high schoolers.

Ask Canada – a new RSC College Interdisciplinary Research Group

When nominated into the Royal Society of Canada College of New Scholars, Artists and Scientists, one is asked to say how they will contribute to the College. During my nomination I pitched an idea for a new Interdisciplinary Research Group (IRG) on quantitative social science research policy and data infrastructure (including survey and social media methods). With the support of a few fellow members (Mark Stoddart, Karen Foster and Elizabeth Dubois) that IRG has just been provisionally approved. Now we are looking for additional members, and writing a funding application to staff some empirical work to support it. Please get in touch with me if you are an RSC College member who is interested to hear more.  A brief description follows:

Ask Canada: Toward robust data infrastructure and policy settings for quantitative social science in Canada

The landscape of quantitative social science research methods in Canada is a chaotic mix of practices and proxies both poorly understood at a system level and poorly equipped to support replicable research. This includes inadequate social science data infrastructure, inattention to policy settings to support empirical methods, and typically (bar a few fee-for-service labs) small, atomized academic teams that experience significant transaction costs in using them. Declining survey response rates drive many to work with polling firms or online modes of distribution that may compromise data quality and generalizability of insight. The UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science highlights the need to “[invest] in open science infrastructures and services”, but there is an ongoing tension globally—recognized by SDG 16 in relation to strong institutions—between high-quality, inclusive and representative data to inform decision-making and adequate protection of privacy. Open government initiatives are improving in line with global initiatives for default-open practices but Canada has thus far been focused on data repositories and access to government data and research, rather than supporting academic-led research. In fact, academic research is explicitly prohibited from accessing some resources (e.g. electoral rolls) that in comparable jurisdictions are available to their social scientists upon application. A piecemeal set of alliances and networks exist in Canada to support various aspects of social science but leave gaps in the support of quantitative social methods. This IRG will undertake literature review, expert methods, workshops and/or public surveys. By its end we will synthesize the state of quantitative social science in Canada, widely mobilize knowledge about best practices and trade-offs, and make recommendations for social science data infrastructure and public policy to foster quantitative social science research for the public interest.

RSC College Induction

At the front of the College bus, in formation waiting to enter the ceremony.

I’m in Toronto after a redeye from Vancouver after the Celebration of Excellence and Engagement (COEE) event hosted by SFU. The COEE is where the Royal Society of Canada (RSC)  inducts new Fellows and members of the College of New Scholars, Artists and Scientists, among other things. It has been a lovely few days at the Parq complex near False Creek.

On the first day I was honored to be asked to participate in a climate change panel for grade 10-12 students run by Let’s Talk Science in partnership with the RSC, along with a Kwakwaka’wakw documentarian and master carver Carey Newman, NRC aerosol chemist Joel Corbin and UTM climate physicist Kent Moore. I loved meeting students like Amaya and her social science teacher who are thinking big thoughts about the role of people in climate change problems and solutions.

This is what the induction looked like at home: Elizabeth Dubois introduces me, to my clear delight.

Me and Melanie Lemire before the College induction ceremony.

The next day was Induction Day, where it became pretty clear that we in the College have a lot more fun than the Fellows. We all took turns introducing one of the other new College members based on a bit of independent research, and we were all challenged to find a connection between our own work and that of the person we are introducing. I introduced the UT translational genomics researcher Trevor Pugh, and the UOttawa social media and politics researcher Elizabeth Dubois introduced me. It is humbling company, indeed! Was lovely to be in the same college class as TranSECT co-lead Melanie Lemire, meet incoming RSC President and Dal Emerita Francoise Baylis, and to get to know Penny Tham, member of the Dalhousie Advisory Council, representing Dalhousie at this year’s COEE.

The next day we had the opportunity to have breakout room discussions across the attending Fellows, College members and university administrators about some key issues for Canada and what role the RSC can take in ameliorating them. The power (and pleasure) was clear of bringing people to a common focus across so many different fields and expertise.

As a final note, I loved the opportunities between events to get out and enjoy the Vancouver seawall, including witnessing the rare asperitas cloud formation (first observed only in 2006!) over False Creek on Friday, and seeing some of the naturalization underway of that shoreline, perhaps as a result of the inspiring reimagination process the City of Vancouver did a few years ago for False Creek that we talk about in our recent paper in the Journal of Flood Risk Management. There is some interesting public art along that shore, too, that seemed particularly interesting given the context of the climate change focus of the COEE. Connecting with my old friend Lynn Ayers from my Prince George days was the cherry on top of my trip.

The rare asperitas cloud formation from Leg in Boot Square, Vancouver

PECS-3 and CAG

I served as a discussant for the Monday plenary at PECS-3

Amidst all the defenses mentioned in the last message, I attended two conferences back-to-back. The first was the third meeting of the Programme on Ecosystem Change and Society (PECS-3), which was held in Montreal. I was honoured to be asked to serve as a discussant, along with Rafa Calderon-Contreras, for the Monday morning plenary that matched Berta Martín-López and Divya Vasudev to talk about relational viewpoints. It was a great event, with lots of wonderful networking, but the plenaries were particularly well designed with compelling pairings in every instance.

Sketch by Pamela Macquarrie of my CAG Lecture

I went straight from Montreal to St. John’s, where the Canadian Association of Geographers were meeting at Memorial. This was a welcome return to my Geography roots. I missed the first day in transit, but every session I attended was interesting. I was excited to be asked to deliver this year’s CAG Lecture, which I did on the Friday afternoon, with a talk called Landscapes on the Edge. Special thanks to Arn Keeling for the invitation and hosting, and Evan Andrews for the lovely introduction. Earlier in the week I had seen Pamela Macquarrie of Mount Royal University doing sketches and watercolours in the various paper sessions, and was delighted that she showed me one she did of me while I was doing my talk (see right). The conference was friendly and inspiring. I sat on a panel about the CAG journal, Canadian Geographies, sponsored by the publisher Wiley, and had a wonderful time on the field trip to Cape Spear with Carissa Brown. The exquisite Cape Spear Café picnic basket lunches were a big highlight on the field trip, as well as the earlier Terre restaurant meal with outgoing president Nathalie Gravel.

Partnerships and defining success with the Atlantic Living Labs

Guest post by Dr. Brooke McWherter

Dr. Brooke McWherter presenting at the Newfoundland Living Lab in Corner Brook, NL.

Across the country right now farmers, farmer organizations, federal and university scientists, industry partners and more are working together to identify and test innovative agricultural practices on working farms to support sustainable production on farms. Called Living Labs (LL), these innovation hubs aim to bring together many of the diverse stakeholders in the agricultural food system to identify, develop and test innovative practices that aim to promote adoption and support Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals.

However collaboration of this scale is never easy and strategic planning can support diverse collaborative networks in identifying connections and create opportunities for finding commonalities among the diverse projects everyone is engaging in. This is where I fit in. As a natural resource social scientist, one of my passions is understanding collaborations and supporting collaborative efforts.

New Brunswick Workshop participants discussed their perceived roles and responsibilities.

My first workshop with the living labs occurred during the New Brunswick Living Lab (NB-LL) Annual Update and Planning workshop where I discussed my research on barriers to adoption and monitoring progress. Working with NB-LL partners we discussed the importance of setting clear roles and expectations and I led participants through a 1-hour workshop developing logic models for each commodity group within the LL. Logic models are useful tools because they allow for partners and organizations to clearly demonstrate their logic for how their activities will lead to specific goals and outcomes of the program. They can also be used for follow-up monitoring and evaluation.

Following this workshop, I met several other Atlantic LL leads who were present, and I was invited to Newfoundland to conduct a 7-hour two-day workshop with all of their partners. Together we first did a partnership mapping exercise which mapped out the different partners and their connections to other groups and then we completed an extended logic model that not only looked at planned activities but also their status which were then compared to current tracking documents.

As a facilitator both of these workshops really highlighted the complexity of running a living lab and what it means to co-produce knowledge. We often say we want more stakeholders involved but the more organizations in a project the harder it can be to keep everyone on the same page, to follow all of the projects involved, and to overcome institutional hurdles such as low incentives for co-creation projects, data sharing restrictions, and partners with high responsibility loads.

However what these experiences and my most recent facilitation role with the Atlantic LL in identifying shared success factors show is the power of relationships. The Atlantic LL team leads from Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, PEI, and Newfoundland really exemplify the types of leaders that have been recruited for this project and the power that comes from collaboration and working together. The different leads are often present at each other’s workshops, work to build cross-provincial connections and projects and support each other in the co-production process. After all no one knows better than them what they are going through.

It has been an amazing experience to work with the Atlantic Living Labs and support their efforts to improve collaboration, co-production, and cross-provincial comparison. I personally can’t wait to see what they come up with in the future.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 Kate Sherren

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑